Why i will be Convinced that Anna Ardin is just a Liar 2020

Why i will be Convinced that Anna Ardin is just a Liar 2020

I will be somewhat upgrading and reposting this from 2012 as the conventional news have actually guaranteed really few individuals understand the information associated with “case” against Julian Assange in Sweden. The UN performing Group ruled that Assange ought to never have already been arrested in britain to start with since there is no situation, with no genuine research. Check this out and also you shall understand why.

One other thing perhaps perhaps not commonly comprehended can there be is not any JURY in a rape test in Sweden which is a SECRET TEST. Every one of the proof, most of the witnesses, are heard in key. No public, no jury, no news. The actual only real general public component is the charging and also the verdict. There is certainly a judge as well as 2 advisers straight appointed by governmental events. So you never ever would get to comprehend exactly just exactly how clearly the full instance is just a stitch-up. Unless you check this out.

You will find therefore inconsistencies that are many Anna Ardin’s accusation of intimate attack against Julian Assange. However the key question which leaps away at me personally – and which strangely I have maybe not seen asked any place else – is it:

Why did Anna Ardin perhaps perhaps not alert Sofia Wilen?

On 16 August, Julian Assange had intercourse with Sofia Wilen. Sofia had become understood into the Swedish team around Assange when it comes to shocking red cashmere sweater she had used within the front row of Assange’s press conference. Anna Ardin knew Assange had been likely to have intercourse with Sofia Wilen. On 17 August, Ardin texted a pal who was simply shopping for Assange:

“He’s not right right here. He’s planned to own sex utilizing the cashmere woman every night, although not managed to make it. Possibly he finally discovered time yesterday?

Yet Ardin later testified that simply three days previously, on 13 August, she was in fact intimately assaulted by Assange; an assault so serious she ended up being prepared to take to (with great success) to ruin Julian Assange’s life that is entire. She has also been to mention that this attack included enforced non-safe sex and she had been concerned with HIV.

If Ardin actually thought that on 13 August Assange had forced unsafe sex she make no attempt to warn Sofia Wilen that Wilen was in danger of her life on her and this could have transmitted HIV, why did? And just why had been Ardin talking about with Assange his desire for sex with Wilen, and texting about this to buddies, without any obvious disapproval or discouragement?

Ardin had Wilen’s contact information as well as had organised her enrollment for the press conference. She may have warned her. But she didn’t.

Why don’t we fit that into an extremely brief survey for the entire Ardin/Assange relationship.

11 August: Assange comes in Stockholm for a press seminar organised by a branch regarding the Social Democratic Party. Anna Ardin has provided her one sleep flat as she will be away for him to stay in.

13 August: Ardin comes home early. She’s got supper with Assange and they’ve got consensual intercourse, in the day that is first of. Ardin afterwards alleges this converted into assault by surreptitious mutilation for the condom.

14 August: Anna volunteers to act as Julian’s press assistant. She sits close to him from the dais at their press seminar. Assange fulfills Sofia Wilen here.

‘Julian desires to head to a crayfish party, anybody have a few available seats tonight or tomorrow? #fb’

This make an effort to find a party that is crayfish, therefore Ardin organises one herself for him, in a yard outside her flat. Anna and Julian appear good together. One visitor hears Anna rib Assange that she thought “you had dumped me” as he got up from sleep early that early morning. Another proposes to Anna that Julian can keep her flat and come stick to them. She replies: “He can stick with me personally. ”

15 August Nevertheless in the crayfish party with Julian, Anna tweets:

‘Sitting in the open air at 02:00 and barely freezing utilizing the world’s coolest smartest people, it’s amazing! #fb’

Julian and Anna, relating to both their authorities testimonies, rest once more in identical solitary sleep, and continue doing therefore for the following day or two. Assange tells police they continue steadily to have intercourse; Anna tells police they cannot. That Anna and Julian go together to, and leave together from, a dinner with the leadership of the Pirate Party evening. They again sleep into the bed that is same.

16 August: Julian goes to have intercourse with Sofia Wilen: Ardin doesn’t alert her of possible assault that is sexual. Another buddy provides Anna to take control housing Julian. Anna once again declines.

20 August: After Sofia Wilen contacts her to say this woman is focused on STD’s including HIV after non-safe sex with Julian, Anna takes her to see Anna’s buddy, other personal Democrat user, previous colleague on a single ballot in a council election, and campaigning feminist police, Irmeli Krans. Ardin tells Wilen the authorities can compel Assange to just simply simply take an HIV test. Ardin sits in throughout Wilen’s that is unrecorded breach of procedure – police meeting. Krans makes a declaration accusing Assange of rape. Wilen will not signal it.


21 August Having heard Wilen’s meeting and Krans’ statement from this, Ardin makes her very own authorities declaration alleging Assange has surreptiously had sex that is unprotected her eight times formerly.

Some times later on: Ardin creates a broken condom towards the authorities as proof; but a forensic assessment discovers no traces of Assange’s – or anyone else’s – DNA about it, as well as it’s evidently unused.

No witness has arrived ahead to express that Ardin complained of intimate attack by Assange before Wilen’s interview that is ardin-arranged Krans – and Wilen arrived ahead never to grumble of a attack, but check into STDs. Wilen declined to signal the declaration alleging rape, that has been drafted by Ardin’s friend Krans in Ardin’s presence.

It is simple this one of a few things took place:


Ardin ended up being intimately assaulted with unsafe sex, but didn’t alert Wilen whenever she knew Assange would definitely see her in hope of intercourse.

Ardin also proceeded to host Assange, assist him, can be found in general general public and private with him, behave as his press assistant, and rest in identical sleep with him, refusing duplicated provides to accommodate him elsewhere, all after he assaulted her.


Ardin desired intercourse with Assange – from whatever motive. She “unexpectedly” returned home early after providing him the utilization of her one sleep flat while she ended up being away. By her very own admission, she had consensual sex with him, within hours of fulfilling him.

She discussed with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and seems at the very least to not have been discouraging. Hearing of Wilen’s concern about HIV after unsafe sex, she took Wilen to her campaigning feminist buddy, policewoman Irmeli Krans, to be able to twist Wilen’s tale right into a sexual assault – really easy provided Sweden’s astonishing “second-wave feminism” rape regulations. Wilen declined to signal.

During the authorities section on 20 August, Wilen texted a buddy at 14.25 “did n’t need to place any costs against JA nevertheless the authorities desired to get a handle on him. ”

At 17.26 she texted because I only wanted him to take a test” that she was “shocked when they arrested JA.

The next night at 22.22 she texted “it had been the authorities who fabricated the charges”.

Ardin then constructed her very own tale of intimate assault. As a lot of friends knew she ended up being making love with Assange, she could not claim non-consensual intercourse. Therefore she manufactured her story to squeeze in with Wilen’s issues by alleging the event associated with condom that is torn. Nevertheless the condom that is torn produced doesn’t have trace of Assange upon it. It really is impractical to wear a condom rather than keep a DNA trace.


No difficulty is had by me in stating that We securely think Ardin to be a liar. On her story to be real involves acceptance of behavior that will be, within the sense that is literal amazing.

Ardin’s tale is needless to say extremely poor, but that doesn’t matter. Firstly, you had been never ever expected to see all of this detail. Rape studies in Sweden take place totally in key. There’s no jury, in addition to federal government appointed judge is flanked by assessors appointed straight by governmental events. The trial will be secret, and the next thing you will hear is that he is guilty and a rapist if Assange goes to Sweden, he will disappear into jail.

Secondly, needless to say, no matter the data is indeed poor, as simply to cry rape is always to tarnish a man’s reputation forever. Anna Ardin has recently succeeded in destroying a lot of the work and life of Assange. The important points of this tale being pathetic is unimportant.

By crying rape, politically proper viewpoint falls in behind the line that it’s incorrect also to look at the data. That she worked with CIA-funded anti-Castro groups in Havana and Miami if you are not allowed to know who the accuser is, how can you find out?

Finally, to those of good use idiots whom declare that how you can test these issues is in court, I would personally state needless to say, you will be appropriate, we ought to trust their state always, fit-ups never happen, and now we should positively condemn the disgraceful behavior of these whom campaigned when it comes to Birmingham Six.

Pridaj komentár

Vaša e-mailová adresa nebude zverejnená. Vyžadované polia sú označené *